Genocide: Was It the Nazis’ Original Plan?


The current essay examined the question of when the Nazis decided on genocide with a specific focus on the extermination of European Jewry.While it is difficult to pinpoint a precise date for the commencement of the Final Solution, this essay suggests the policy was decided upon by high ranking Nazis in 1941 and, finally, legally codified in 1942 in the Wannsee Conference.

Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Genocide: Was It the Nazis’ Original Plan?
Get a PLAGIARISM-FREE custom essay written for you!
Order Essay

The Confluence of Several Dangerous Ideas

No political idea simply becomes government policy overnight; rather, the process from one to the other occurs in complex ways.Indeed, the critic Christopher Browning, who penned an entire book titled The Origins of the Final Solution (2005), broadly concludes that there is no specific origin or beginning point, as such.

As Browning puts it, “there is no clear and unambiguous dividing line between origins and implementation that would be valid for all regions of Europe under German occupation”. For this reason, trying to pinpoint the precise moment that the Nazis, so to speak, decided on genocide is problematic. For instance, if we wish to identify the senior level administrative policy decision on the Final Solution, we may reasonably cite the 20th of January 1942 as a key date: this was the date of the Wannsee Conference, whereat the “policy agreement” for the “Final Solution of the European Jewish question” was formulated, thereby outlining “the procedural guidelines for the future exterminations for physically healthy Jews were laid down once and for all”. (The procedure in question was liquidation via hard labour.) Yet manifold instances and legal rulings prior to this admittedly significant moment testify to a good deal of genocidal forethought long in advance of the Wannsee Conference.
One of the primary critical difficulties in unlocking the truth behind the Nazis’ policy of genocide is the cloak of euphemism the Reich upheld to conceal the reality of their dreadful actions. “Final Solution” is itself a euphemism, as is (or, perhaps better to say, was) the term “concentration camp” (standing in for “extermination camp”). Because the Nazis employed a discourse of obscurity in their legislative pronouncements, it can be difficult to get to the truth of the matter. As it happens, the difference between what official Nazi language would suggests and what historical facts prove to be the case represents a vast semantic gulf. Although it is hard as a contemporary reader to distance oneself from the connotations of the term “concentration camp”, one should bear in mind the extremely different implications this term evokes as compared to “extermination camp”. Such semantic dissonance is rife in Nazi legislature and official Reich discourse. As a result, scholars note the “appearance of contradictions between policy and practice”: an issue which can be explained with reference to “the euphemisms used” to “cloak” major implementations of liquidation programmes.
While 1942 may be described as the year in which the formal decision was taken and, in effect, made policy, there are good grounds to mark 1941 as the year in which an integral Party decision was taken: that set the course for the systematic extermination of European Jewry. As a consequence, the scholar Richard Breitman argues that this was the year in which the “fundamental decision to exterminate the Jews” was made; and that, in direct consequence of this decision, “the Final Solution was just a matter of time – and timing”. The Final Solution was at this inception stage targeted very specifically at European Jews. This is to do firstly with geographical reasons. Germany as a European country bordering on a number of other European countries was more directly in contact with European Jews than those from other continents. While the Nazis’ official hatred for the Jews was not in theory localised (indeed, Hitler despised the Jews as a race, as opposed to a religion on nationally heterogeneous people), in practice the European Jews felt the brunt of its brutality. This very likely had a lot to do with Hitler’s bearing a specific resentment for German Jews (a distinction which the Fuhrer tried to negate), whom, for various and highly dubious reasons, he blamed for causing Germany to lose the First World War.
Interestingly, there is some debate as to how much Hitler actually knew about the Final Solution and all its grisly details. In this regard, an entry from Goebbels’s diary recounts an episode from December of that year. Hitler had gathered all the highest ranking Nazi officials to his Berlin apartment for a special meeting, the Reichsleiter and Gauleiter. The journal runs: “Concerning the Jewish question, the Fuhrer is determined to make a clean sweep. He prophesied to the Jews that if they were once again to cause a world war, the result would be their own destruction”; Goebbels goes on to affirm that the latter ominous assertion was “no figure of speech”. Indeed it was not; the policy was already underway. This commenced with the 1941 invasion of the USSR, whereupon was witnessed the “crystallisation of a general policy of killing”. At the same time, large numbers of Jews from Easter and central Europe were being shipped out to camps, with fatal intent.


The aforementioned obliqueness of Reich discourse makes it impossible to say for sure how informed and involved Hitler was in the Holocaust; how and when the decision for genocide was made. But we may nonetheless posit an informed surmise. By the end of 1942, the evidence clearly indicates, Hitler knew exactly what was going on and was fixed on a course of action: genocide.
Bloxham D, Kushner T, Kushner A R J, The Holocaust: Critical Historical Approaches (Manchester University Press, 2005).
Breitman R, “Plans for the Final Solution in Early 1941” (1994) German Studies Review, 17, 483-489.
Browning C, The Origins of the Final Solution (Arrow Books, 2005).
Cesarani D, The Final Solution: Origins and Implementation (Taylor and Francis, 2002).
Falk A, Anti-Semitism: A History and Psychoanalysis of Contemporary Hatred (Praeger, 2008).
Fleming, G. Hitler and the Final Solution (University of California Press, 1991).
Kerr J, Germany, 1919-1939 (Heinemann, 2003).

Homework Paper
Calculate your paper price
Pages (550 words)
Approximate price: -

Our Advantages

Plagiarism Free Papers

All our papers are original and written from scratch. We will email you a plagiarism report alongside your completed paper once done.

Free Revisions

All papers are submitted ahead of time. We do this to allow you time to point out any area you would need revision on, and help you for free.

Free Title-page

A title page preceeds all your paper content. Here, you put all your personal information and this we give out for free.

Free Bibliography

Without a reference/bibliography page, any academic paper is incomplete and doesnt qualify for grading. We also offer this for free.

Originality & Security

At Homework Sharks, we take confidentiality seriously and all your personal information is stored safely and do not share it with third parties for any reasons whatsoever. Our work is original and we send plagiarism reports alongside every paper.

24/7 Customer Support

Our agents are online 24/7. Feel free to contact us through email or talk to our live agents.

Try it now!

Calculate the price of your order

We'll send you the first draft for approval by at
Total price:

How it works?

Follow these simple steps to get your paper done

Place your order

Fill in the order form and provide all details of your assignment.

Proceed with the payment

Choose the payment system that suits you most.

Receive the final file

Once your paper is ready, we will email it to you.

Our Services

We work around the clock to see best customer experience.


Flexible Pricing

Our prces are pocket friendly and you can do partial payments. When that is not enough, we have a free enquiry service.


Admission help & Client-Writer Contact

When you need to elaborate something further to your writer, we provide that button.


Paper Submission

We take deadlines seriously and our papers are submitted ahead of time. We are happy to assist you in case of any adjustments needed.


Customer Feedback

Your feedback, good or bad is of great concern to us and we take it very seriously. We are, therefore, constantly adjusting our policies to ensure best customer/writer experience.